This Course at MIT pages are part of the OCW Educator initiative, which seeks to enhance the value of OCW for educators.
Course Overview
This page focuses on the course 24.500 Topics in Philosophy of Mind: Mental Content as it was taught by Alex Byrne and Agustín Rayo in Spring 2015.
Propositions are everywhere in the philosophy of mind. Believing, hoping, and intending (for example) are said to be “propositional attitudes,” mental states that involve relations to propositions. This seminar examines issues at the heart of the dispute between the proposition-aficionados and their detractors. The course is divided into five parts: (1) de se thought; (2) propositions; (3) knowing how; (4) perceptual content; and (5) the knowledge argument.
Course Outcomes
Course Goals for Students
- Discuss readings spotlighting de se thought, propositions, knowing how, perceptual content, and the knowledge argument
- Examine issues at the heart of the dispute between proposition-aficionados and their detractors
- Synthesize understanding of one of the topics in the course in a lengthy term paper
Curriculum Information
Prerequisites
Permission of instructor
Requirements Satisfied
CI-M
Offered
Variable semester offerings
We, as the instructors, disagreed on many philosophical issues and aired our disagreements in the seminar. This made for a more lively class, and was also (we think) helpful for the students.
—Alex Byrne and Agustín Rayo
Below, Alex Byrne and Agustín Rayo describe various aspects of how they taught 24.500 Topics in Philosophy of Mind: Mental Content.
Selecting Content
In this class, the specific readings often followed naturally from the topics we addressed. There are certain classic pieces any discussion of (say) knowing how should include, and we read those. We also took advantage of visitors to MIT and philosophers in the area whose research included topics from the seminar, and invited them to give presentations.
Keeping Class Engaging
Some of the topics we discussed in the class led naturally to rich discussion, because they raised methodological questions about how best to attack the problems around which the debates were centered.
Moreover, we, as the instructors, disagreed on many philosophical issues and aired our disagreements in the seminar. This made for a more lively class, and was also (we think) helpful for the students.
We devoted the final session of the class to student-presentations, with each student spending 15 or 20 minutes talking about their final paper. This seemed like a fun and interesting event for all concerned. We thought it was especially helpful for students to get feedback from their peers, and to get a sense of what others were working on.
Assessment
The following factors were considered when determining students’ grades:
- Class attendance
- Assigned readings
- A 20-25 page final paper
Student Information
Typical Student Background
Most of the students in this class were philosophy graduate students from MIT and neighboring universities.
During an average week, students were expected to spend 12 hours on the course, roughly divided as follows:
In Class
- Met 1 time per week for 3 hours per session; 15 sessions total.
- Three sessions featured guest speakers.
- Students presented their papers during one of the final sessions.
Out of Class
- Students spent time outside of class on the assigned and supplementary readings.
- Students also researched and wrote their final papers, which were 20-25 pages in length.
Semester Breakdown
WEEK | M | T | W | Th | F |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | |||||
2 | |||||
3 | |||||
4 | |||||
5 | |||||
6 | |||||
7 | |||||
8 | |||||
9 | |||||
10 | |||||
11 | |||||
12 | |||||
13 | |||||
14 | |||||
15 | |||||
16 |