This section features the required readings listed by topic. For some topics, reading questions are available.
SES # | TOPICS | READINGS | READING QUESTIONS |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Introduction: Energy and Society | ||
2-3 | Energy in Early America: Fields, Fire, Wind, and Water |
| (PDF) |
4-5 | Industrial Revolution I: Coal and the Transformation of America |
Greenberg, Dolores. "Energy, Power, and Perceptions of Social Change in the Early Nineteenth Century." American Historical Review 95, no. 3 (June 1990): 693-714. | (PDF) |
6-7 | Inventing Energy: Thermodynamics in the 19th Century |
The Helmholtz material is dense at times. Try to get through it, but focus more on his argument. Who is he writing for? What is he trying to argue? What evidence does he use? What rhetorical strategies does he pursue? Is he convincing?
Rabinbach here links developments in science to European thinking about people and the economy. Riskin, Jessica. "The Defecating Duck, Or, The Ambiguous Origins of Artificial Life." Critical Inquiry 29, no. 4 (Summer 2003): 599-633. | (PDF) |
8 | Industrial Revolution II: Miners, Strikes, and Labor |
Gorn, Elliott. Mother Jones: The Most Dangerous Woman in America. New York, NY: Hill and Wang, 2002. Songs and Ballads of the Bituminous Miners (mining songs collected by George Korson). | |
9-10 | Electrification I: Building the Network |
![]() ![]() | (PDF) |
11-12 | Electrification II: Energy, Gender, and the Home |
———. "The 'Industrial Revolution' in the Home: Household Technology and Social Change in the Twentieth Century." Technology and Culture 17, no. 1 (January 1976): 1-23. Goldstein, Carolyn M. "From Service to Sales: Home Economics in Light and Power, 1920-1940." Technology and Culture 38, no. 1 (January 1997): 121-52. | (PDF) |
13-14 | The Industrialization of Agriculture |
![]() | |
15-16 | The Century of Oil |
| (PDF) |
17-18 | Automobiles, Suburbanization, and American Demography in the Twentieth Century |
You're welcome to read the whole thing, but at least read the introduction, chapters 1, 2, 4, 7, and the conclusion. | |
19-20 | Nuclear Power and Nuclear Weapons |
I encourage you to read the whole Badash book if you can-it is short-but we will focus our discussion on chapters 2-4 (pages 11 to 62).
| |
21-22 | Limits to Growth and the Energy Crisis of the 1970s |
For Horowitz, you don't have to read the whole book (unless, of course, you want to). Do be sure to read the Introduction (pages 1-28), as well as the documents on pages 33-42; 120-33; 138-49; 161-71. The section at the beginning called "Cast of Characters" (page xvii) and the timeline for the 70s energy crises at the end (page 185) may be useful references. For those of you who have been desiring more primary sources, this is your week. For this reading, pay attention to how the different authors, from the President on to his advisors, supporters, and critics, diagnose and propose treatment for the 1979 phase of the "energy crisis." What was the crisis, and why did it look so different to so many people? Hubbert, M. King. "Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels." Presented at the American Petroleum Institute conference, March 8, 1956. The article is pretty short, and I hope you find it interesting. Be sure to look for what are Hubbert's key points in the article, as well as his vision for the future. Jimmy Carter Speeches (transcripts and audio) | |
23-24 | Global Warming |
It's ok to skim parts that don't seem as relevant to the overall picture, but do try to make your way through the book. Chapters 1-2, 5, and 7-8 are the most important. You may also want to check out The Discovery of Global Warming, the book's Web site at the American Institute of Physics, where Weart has published a much longer version of this book with even more annotations, and a gigantic bibliography of the scientific literature on climate change. | |
25-26 | The World Ahead |
The Bush-Cheney Energy Plan: National Energy Policy. Report of the National Policy Development Group, May 2001. ( Skim the National Energy Policy. It is long. Read it to get a sense of what the plan actually is/was. |