This Course at MIT pages are part of the OCW Educator initiative, which seeks to enhance the value of OCW for educators.
Course Overview
This page focuses on the course 21W.747 Rhetoric as it was taught by Professor Steven Strang in Spring 2015.
This course is an examination of the theory, the practice, and the implications of rhetoric and rhetorical criticism. Students study the forms and structures of argumentation, including the organization of ideas, awareness of audience, methods of persuasion, evidence, factual vs. emotional argument, figures of speech, and historical forms and uses of arguments.
Course Outcomes
Course Goals for Students
- Read and listen rhetorically (analyze messages directed at you, avoid being manipulated)
- Think rhetorically (discover all possible means of persuasion, see persuasive possibilities, and evaluate those possibilities)
- Write rhetorically (accommodate audiences, clarify your purposes & strategies for yourself and for your audience, be as persuasive as possible with the evidence you have, and use your rhetorical skills ethically so as not to persuade others with questionable tactics)
Curriculum Information
Prerequisites
None
Requirements Satisfied
- HASS-H
- CI-H
Offered
Every fall and spring semester
One of the ‘big insights’ of rhetoric has always been to know your audience and tailor your message to them. I have found that concrete examples are the best way to make theoretical and abstract ideas more real and understandable for just about any audience, and certainly for students. If I can make the example humorous, as well, then that’s all to the good since humor tends to be more memorable for many of us.
— Steven Strang
In the following pages, Professor Steven Strang describes various aspects of how he teaches 21W.747 Rhetoric.
Assessment
Grade Breakdown
The students' grades were based on the following activities:
Instructor Insights on Assessment
Prof. Strang shares the essay evaluation criteria in the syllabus.
Student Information
Breakdown by Year
Mostly undergraduates
Enrollment Cap
Limited to 18 students per section (There were two sections this semester.)
During an average week, students were expected to spend 12 hours on the course, roughly divided as follows:
In class
- Met 2 times per week for 1.5 hours per session; 25 sessions total.
- During class sessions, students framed artifacts. During these exercises, they analyzed artifacts' key components, illustrated rhetorical moves colleagues could use in their own writing, and made connections between texts.
- Students each gave one persuasive speech.
- Several class sessions were devoted to workshop sessions.
Out of Class
- Essay writing
- Consultation with the Writing and Communication Center
- Readings
- Preparation for framing exercise
- Preparation for persuasive speech
Semester Breakdown
WEEK | M | T | W | Th | F |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | |||||
2 | |||||
3 | |||||
4 | |||||
5 | |||||
6 | |||||
7 | |||||
8 | |||||
9 | |||||
10 | |||||
11 | |||||
12 | |||||
13 | |||||
14 | |||||
15 | |||||
16 |